[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14655373 [View]
File: 796 KB, 1200x800, 1580608800357.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14655373

>>14655309
>Baudrillard

>> No.14647527 [View]
File: 796 KB, 1200x800, 1580608766859.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14647527

>>14647508
No, for a set is merely a mode of manifestation of pure quantity, not unlike the natural numbers themselves. It is a legitimate concept when given its proper place; that place certainly not being anywhere near "sufficient (and even necessary as claimed by some highly despicable beings) to describe all mathematical objects in a non-degenerate way".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]