/lit/ - Literature

>>17801633
I get the feeling Wolfgang Smith isn't taken too seriously by the scientific community. And it's a shame he makes his fringe "vertical causality" notion such a central theme to ALL his works since it'd be nice to have someone who is obviously philosophically competent while also being scientifically literate to help navigate the conjunction between modern physics and philosophy for people who aren't deep in that field.
If anyone who is more scientifically competent than me can offer their thoughts on Smith (or Bohr and Kuhn, for that matter) and how batshit off the mark his stuff is or if it's viable, i'd appreciate it.