/lit/ - Literature

>>13924384
https://www.feldgrau.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17630&start=15

>in 2006, internet forums were for people who knew people who knew a guy who knew hitler to share comfy experiences

how far we've fallen bros

>>13653476
No, that comes later

>be incredibly insightful marxist
>ruin it by constantly being blinkered jewish exceptionalist who just presumes jews should run everybody's countries through dominating their intelligentsia

A tale as old as time

"Taken as a whole, [Max Stirner] is awful, loutish, pretentious, self-important, a Pennalist, a degenerate student, a lump, an egomaniac, clearly a serious psychopath. He crows in a loud, unpleasant voice: I am Me, I care about nothing but Myself. His verbal sophisms are unbearable. The hep cat of his cigar-smoking, basement-bar bohemian lifestyle is disgusting. " - Carl Schmitt

*blocks your Caesaro-Papist path*

whew...

[Quoting Gerhard Ladner] ”Difficult problems within the sacramental dogma arose at the same time (11th century) as the Church, with unprecedented intensity, began to challenge the peculiar entwining of the spirit of Christianity with the spirit of secular reality that ensued in the West in consequence of an autonomous reform based on a new jurisprudential point of view; this was a step not followed by the Greek Orthodox Church and, therefore, became totally ensared by Caesaro-papism.” In addition, Ladner correctly points out that ever since the eleventh century the Roman papacy forged a new legal system, destructive to the German empire, and the struggle over the relationship between the temporarl and the spiritual was conceived as a legal dispute as well as a sacramental conflict."

>>10326067
Heidegger wasn't a leftie, but his thought leads directly to Derrida and from there feminist epistemologies, radical skepticism, moral relativism.

Nice pic but Junger and Heidegger oppose each other in thought. Their correspondence displays a real arrogance on Heidegger's part. Both Carl Schmitt and Ernst Junger are anti-Heidegger.

I would go as far as to say they are both anti-Nietzsche, but for different reasons.

A nice Schmitt quote on Heidegger:
"Many cite Heraclitus' sentence "War is the father of all things. But few dare to think thereby of civil war."

"The Great task of making visible the Christian Epimetheus from which the Heraclitean Epimetheus Hegel represents only an apostasy. Cleary this apostasy is still a thousand times greater than that UN-Toynbee and the positivists of the West." What did Carl Schmitt mean by this?

>>8654694
I forgot Carl Schmitt. He joined the Nazis in the 1930s but they kicked him out in '36 because they thought he was faking it and was secretly a Catholic and a Hegelian.

Also, Hegel a shit

10/10

Who

>prefers the familiar to the unknown...the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss (Oakeshott)

here?

Who are the great conservative authors and poets?

Trollope? Housman? Thackerary? Pascal? Heidegger? Oakeshott? Schmitt?

Can we class John Wyndham's comfortable middle-class science fiction classics as conservative despite their crass genre identification given their intense concern with the fragility of human culture?

K n i g h t O f F a i t h

>>6571541
>Every actual democracy rests on the principle that not only are equals equal but unequals will not be treated equally. Democracy requires, therefore, first homogeneity and second—if the need arises elimination or eradication of heterogeneity.

Good lord, when he gets into it there really isn't an author with more power than Schmitt is there? The words seem to contain some kind of immense force that drives you irresistably to his conclusions.

Certainly a better writer than that cunt Rawls, whose empty words, arbitrary thought experiments, and insipid "justifications" for the dopiest politics possible, are liable to send a sane man to sleep.

Good lord, when he gets into it there really isn't an author with more power than Schmitt is there? The words seem to contain some kind of immense force that drives you irresistably to his conclusions.

Certainly a better writer than that cunt Rawls, whose empty words, arbitrary thought experiments, and insipid "justifications" for the dopiest politics possible, are liable to send a sane man to sleep.

There's only one confirmed twentieth century shitlord worth reading and his name ain't Ebola.

Name a better political author than Carl Schmitt.

Pro-tip: you can't.