[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21926069 [View]
File: 891 KB, 2866x3012, PXL_20230407_151837146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21926069

>>21925404
Study Bibles blow fat dicks and are midwit territory at best. I don't have a horse in the race but medieval jewish commentary of the old testament is better than the trash published now. Commentary is single author shit or not worth it. There is no winning no matter what you do, it takes more than one translation and a metric fuckload of commentary to get the most out of it.

You can have most of these used for cheap or free online. Others are, well they're expensive. I'd get a classy translation in a nice format with paragraph format, preferably single columns that aren't stupid wide, wide margins and annotate it yourself. The KJV is an occasionally difficult and outright painfully obtuse read at times but it's easier to annotate than anything else. You fix words, not sentences. You pay for format and convenience, I paid for the convenience of the Alter translation. I'd pay for a Rashi set if I gave enough of a fuck about Hebrew. I have little good to say about jews other than that they price their own products for their own fairly for what you get.

For a single bible translation for reading? Good format, good price? RSV oxford annotated hardback, new Cambridge paragraph in any format, Pitt Minion if you don't mind small font, wide margin Cambridge if you want larger font but the same format, Alter for 70 bucks if you only want to read the old testament with excellent commentary in fuckhueg hardback. A few other publishers do nice bindings for well under a hundred bucks.

It's more like you want a core edition that has a nice layout and room to annotate and use a website that feels like hacking the matrix for clarifying things. I wouldn't pay for commentary, especially not by anyone who is long dead or an evangelical council.

>> No.21909281 [View]
File: 891 KB, 2866x3012, PXL_20230407_151837146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21909281

>>21909252
As a pretentious wanker, I have to say that there are much nicer printings of just about everything, just not the exact thing you want. I could go either way on single/double column but paragraph format, minimizing references to literally anywhere that doesn't take up much space in the text, and soft leather covers goes a long way towards being a nice book to read. Cambridge and Schuyler might have something up your alley.

>> No.21883752 [View]
File: 891 KB, 2866x3012, PXL_20230407_151837146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21883752

>>21875599
After some extensive study, anything made by a committee that isn't the KJV blows fat dicks.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]