/lit/ - Literature

> Economic development is only a phenomenon. [Political] concentration or democracy has the potential to promote or inhibit economic development. The matter of concern is what societal changes after economic development will be conducive to the development of political democracy. Because their economy does not develop, developing countries have no choice but to economically rely on developed countries, mainly in high-tech equipment, precision instruments and so on. However, depending on the stage of development of each country, such as African countries, they mainly need food to maintain basic living conditions. Whatever the need, the result is a special exchange mechanism: developing countries need to come up with the best things to exchange with developed countries. Therefore, the people of developing countries cannot enjoy the best products produced in the country, and even the second-class products cannot enjoy them, because the second-class products are to be consumed by foreigners who come to these countries.

> Products in various regions of the United States are available in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Jamaica, and Mexico. The best products from all over the world are flocking to the US market in exchange for the US dollar. Since everyone wants to get the US dollar and form a strong competition, the quality of the products is very high and the price is very low. This situation has caused unprecedented prosperity in the US market.

> This is the result of the market mechanism, and it is also the benefit of the United States dollar status determined by the Bretton Woods Conference after the Second World War. Of course, foreign products have entered the United States in large numbers, impacting the industry of the United States itself, causing factories to close down and increasing unemployment. This cannot be seen, so the two forces of free trade and protectionism have been fighting endlessly.