/lit/ - Literature

>>14782649
He was right. Evolutionary fitness in today's society no longer means being able to lift heavy weight, being muscular or physical strength in general. With automatization in full swing, modern society demands greater quantity of intelligent and creative men as opposed to stereotypical jocks. So the demand is there but the women are not supplying as their tastes and patterns of attraction have failed to catch up with technological progress. That's why women are reactionaries and counter-evolutionaries - a little play on words. If we leave them unchecked, they will give birth to hoards of muscular birdbrains into a society that no longer needs them as they're easily disposable and can only perform the simplest labors where they have to compete with machinery. This will create greater technological unemployment and pressure on our welfare system and will inevitably bring economic and societal disaster. Our governments should stop delluding public opinion that the sexual market will regulate itself and finally pursue some action.

What is the essential incel literary canon? I'd imagine it would have to be an assortment of evolutionary psychology, reactionary takes on the Sexual Revolution and Christian conservative writers

since incelism will probably be the next Marxism, we should probably compile a list of incel theory and praxis
I'll start
Weininger "Sex and Character"
Eliott Rodger "My Twisted World"