/lit/ - Literature

>>19881611
John David Ebert
Philosophy Overdose
Aydin Paladin
Jonathan Pageau
Theories of Everything
Academic Agent
Charlemenge
A dormant Dynasty
Theoria Apophasis
Monistic Idealism
Thoughts on Thinking
Joe Galbo
Jason Reza Jorjani
TeacherOfPhilosophy
meh

based

>>15958916
Does that contradict the trinity?

so we can't know anything about the noumena, but what if "future" the term refers to phenomenon that comes from the noumena of the future?

so, let me put it this way:
if, and when the "future" is predictable say we plan for [x, y, z] and [x, y, z] or even [z, x, y, z...] etc. happen it may in a techincal phenomenal sense be techincally "future," but since it went accordingly to plan, the only new information/event it can ultimately yield is "plans are working correctly"
now if you plan for [x, y, z,] and get [x, y, 56]- something not only unplanned but unforseen entirely- you learn from it change your plans, and records the reason for doing so
this is the "Future" we refer to when we mean future with actual meaning that is intrinsic to "Future"- that is a future that is unknown and that consequently drives adaptation- a future we are inevitably driving ourselves toward.
if we could plan for this (i.e. know it) it wouldn't be the future. the only reason we CAN "know" enough to give it a damn and talk about the concept with ease is because we address it in relation to the phenomenon of past and present- the things that we observe or can observe
the future is the noumena contingent on the phenomena of the present

is this retarded? am I even making sense?
I'm retarded right?

>live life
>its good

Thank you imagination