/lit/ - Literature

>>22101735
The reason I insist on being a "perfectionist retard" in threads about Kant is exactly because it's difficult to read him (and easy to misinterpret him) without being familiar with the conversation in which he was immersed. As such, I really disagree with your implication that Kant is hiding behind language. Rather than "overlaying the gist of what he's trying to say on my own patterns of thought," I found reading Kant to give perfect clarity to thoughts and arguments that had already been brewing in me.

You also have to appreciate that some of what he was trying to say was so far ahead of language at the time. For instance, in one of his sections on Hume and causality, he gives the counterexample of a boat moving up and down a river in an irregular pattern. Of course, anyone familiar with computer graphics knows what he's talking about — a glitch. Kant is imagining a boat glitching up and down a river and arguing that, without a general law of causality, that is how we would perceive things. How the fuck was Kant able to imagine something like that? It boggles the mind.

By the way, you really write like a freshman. You need to clean up your own writing and not be so quick to judge those that are considered the greatest minds in history. People can certainly be well regarded and wrong, but you need to make sure that you understand them first — and then make sure you understand your critique of them so that others might also understand it.

Obviously this nihilistic pessimistic schtick is just that otherwise these people wouldn't filibuster they would just kill themselves the real debate is what do we do about the population because a few beard twiddling overthinking people will use this as an ideology to live hedonistically under the cover of complaining and then a lot of Indians and Africans and so on will continue to have the room temperature IQ children until the Earth is barren of all life.

To say nothing of the current Nations and their status quo this will cause the world as we know it to eventually run out of these bargain bin ethnicities to hopscotch back and forth as a means of Outsourcing population and demographics. No one that doesn't want to have unprotected sex with attractive healthy partners everyone wants eugenics by its very nature because that's what you're evolved to want it's just pretty healthy people fucking. Homo and asexuality and so on aren't valid identities let alone biological realities. They're mental illnesses.

In order to perpetuate itself as ridiculous as it may sound the state will have to create a system of orphanages in which people can apply to basically breed and then dump the kid off cuz no one wants to raise it and then go back to their being doctors or Instagram influencers etc.

That's the smart path forward that's not malicious but this system is not smart and is malicious. I hope you like tsunamis of trash and can speak Igbo.