/lit/ - Literature

>>19606459

>>12133893
I'll give you five seconds to reconsider your position.

>>12127523
to an extent. while yes some people have double standards when it comes to something like this, simply because some do doesn't mean the point itself - characters shouldn't be gay for no reason - isn't valid. I would say if a character were straight for no reason it would too be disagreeable.

they don't seem to know it but their argument is only valid when it comes to the hypocrites they mention. once you get past them their argument fails.

>>12022856
theres a rich paradox here. being virtuous in the face of things you cant control makes you a cuck. but it could easily said, and it will be by me, that letting other people dictate your emotions makes you a cuck in its own right. you are a cuck, just of a different breed.

>>11748175
yeah, what of it?