[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.7242635 [View]
File: 18 KB, 180x180, 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7242635

"It is impossible to step twice into the same river, it scatters and regathers, comes together and dissolves, approaches and departs" - Heraclitus (Plutarch, On the E at Delphi 392bIO-c3 Babbit)

You will know journeys in their experience. You will know them as days and not myths whose reality can not be proven. Finally you will know the absence of Art.

Revelation is Art overcoming its absence- an Art which lives through mythology. It does not concern itself with utilitarian questions- if you do not hold the mythological prerequisites for knowing it as a transcendence of its absence, then you simply can not know Art. It needn't know itself as mythology, but mythology is a prerequisite for it. Its absence can not be proven, but will conserve itself in its mythological basis. Silence is its coffin.

Articulation has revealed itself to me like a seal bobbing its head up from the water or like old cans floating up to the surface in unrhythmic continuity. Articulation separates myths in to myths. It has no utility, it reveals a utility myth. Categorisation has no utility. To categorise is to engage in mythology. Categorisation does not necessarily reveal itself as mythology. Axiom myths may be included in a mythology. Precisely because mythology draws in axiom myths does it need to be institutionalised. There are no axioms, only myths. Silence is necessarily absent of axiom myths. Axioms will conserve themselves in so far as they conceal themselves. Through axiom myths do Beings reveal themselves. In platitudes Beings are revealed. In Silence Beings die.

[cont.]

>> No.7230638 [View]
File: 18 KB, 180x180, 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7230638

Apparitions

“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.” - Heraclitus

I am drifting through farce and its alternative, as well as mythology and its alternative. People live through farce and mythology: Farce reveals itself at its most farcical when it claims to be free of itself. Mythology reveals itself at its most mythological when it claims to be free of itself. There is an ignorance that is imposed during contemplation: Ignorance only reveals itself in the face of a task which can not be completed. I am seeking something: An apparition. There are times when we take something to be negative and wish to remove its attributes but can not understand the procedures necessary for its removal. We may suddenly get strange mythological ideas that may or may not align with the truth. We may begin journeys with intentions which change halfway through. We may pretend myths are completely without substance. We may associate our myths with an objective attribute. We may trigger a change in colour or sense-data and assume we have an objective for the journey. We name separate ideas of objects and persons based on preference, observation, and ignorance. We separate ideas of objects and persons based on preference, observation, and ignorance. We presuppose attributes and laws based on memories of the migration of colour and "sense-data". Every moment we are seized by phenomenological apparitions revealing themselves as "sense-data".

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]