/lit/ - Literature

>>7118414

Of course. But even if it weren't a matter of accuracy, I would still prefer the history of great men to the history of slaves and peasants.

Monarchy remains supreme. But everything depends on the monarch.

There is nothing easier to fix than a corrupt Monarchy. Just kill the king. But in a democratic bureaucracy like ours, who could you kill to purge the corruption? No one. It is too deeply entrenched.

Nietzsche would say 'any country with this many politicians deserves to perish by all these politicians'.

Schopenhauer said 'I would rather be ruled by a lion than by a pack of rats', and that is exactly what we have today: in Washington, in London, in Moscow, in Beijing, in Berlin and in Paris.

There is something truly contemptible about 'leaders' who are obliged to barter and haggle with the vulgar masses for allotments of power.

>>6739820

How do you think, autist?

Or are you just not acquainted with human history prior to the French Revolution?