/lit/ - Literature

>>20091646
Uncle Nick.

young nick land will be the left wing of acceleration.
old nick land will be the right

How come Land is not discussed here? He is the greatest contemporary philosopher.

Neoreactionary ethnonationalist anarcho-capitalism with characteristics of an absolute monarchy, elements of feudalism and fascist tendencies. Embrace capital, it's inescapable

>>17638696
Accelerate.

>>17605060
A necessary corrective meme
>>17605120
>YARVIN: dude, Silicon Valley princeships, more of the same but autistically granular, and harder and faster
Unlimited Hangouts are the only way we colonize the stars

>>17605351
Based

>>17613445
The Aeonic Last Man is civilizationally expressed in Red China, with its Anglo-Z[redacted] Babylonian banking stans — if Faustian/Promethean Man overcomes this, we will burst the historical Ixion’s Wheel into Space Imperiun — the only way out is through and up

>>17442401
Still, a STEM background needn't be necessary for the future's literature as long as one has access to methamphetamines (refer to Nick Land's Fanged Noumena).

Is Nick Land still a thing here?

He's the only philosopher to ever leave a lasting impression on me.

>exclusively listen to techno and jungle
>watch cyberpunk films
>change my twitter avi to a lain picture
>shitpost about deleuze
>advocate for libertarian capitalism even though I'm left-wing
what else should I do to be a good Landian?

The enlightenment was a mistake

No, start with Kant and go forward. If you want to learn about any of the Greeks just watch YouTube videos or use the the philosophy glossary online from stanford.

>>16099055
ummm based?

>>15933470
No idea

>There was always something shoddy about this God. Lost on the way to being, and to us. Even lost, for a little while, on the way to death. A stumbler, an unwitting clown, everything he does is botched, improvised, ostentatious; his past a mix of gaucherie and tantrum. Nowhere a hint of precocity, but always retardation, leaving abundant signs of a debilitating learning-difficulty wherever he makes a mark, a slow child. (Even the theologians admit to his ‘simplicity’.) His diminishing flock rarely ask him about scientific matters any more, few of them dare ask themselves. He long ago dropped out of such classes, to the secret relief of his family. For a while they insisted that he had other gifts—ineffable ones—and (with the blindness of mothers) praised the ageing infant’s good nature, which they said had calmed down a lot. One can only smile.

>It is true that we probably merited a better God to sacrifice. It is not unreasonable to imagine that a cosmos that spawned a Herakleitus deserved a more dignified ruler than the grumpy old ape of Occidental monotheism. Nevertheless, it is pointless nursing such regrets. They belong to the mournful ‘might have beens’ of our history; decided long before we had a chance to shop around for a God.

Yup, I'm thinking based.

Was accelerationism ever a serious philosophy or is it just a stale meme that should have died off years ago?

Was accelerationism ever a serious philosophy or is it just a rancid meme from five years ago?

WHo is tHE GUeN0n FaG iN thE bOttOm l3FT C0rN3r?

>>15212684

>>15174308
Based meltdown

>>15080154

How can anyone doubt this being the thought that is going to be most influential in coming century?

The more I read of acc the more I understand this

The only information we have on it is indirect and a mix mash of papers loosely connect.

Gnosticism today is a recreation that has little to do with Gnosticism in previous era.

Women allowed in clergy.

is usually Christianity for edgelords