/lit/ - Literature

>>18500686
I think I get what this anon >>18500620 is saying.
So, you replied that: because progressives don't identify as social darwinists it wouldn't make sense to call them that.
What the [>686] anon then replied was, in a confusing but digestible language, the means by which modern progressives adopted that type of thought and retoric: made by NWO agencies (like the Bilderberg group, or World Economic Forum, among others) through the use of technology (by which 686 frased "ideas find their own suitable vehicles by information and lack thereof", this being the adoption of an idea created by Moldbug which he describes ideas as being viruses, and that left-wing ones, since they are created in urban spaces, spread faster and among lots of people, which is why progressives always win the culture war)
What [686] didn't explain is *why* they created this retoric and thought, to which I'd argue it is for the growth of capital. This is on the progressives (also known as the New Left):

"The sexual revolution brought about by the New Left has, in fact, aided in making capitalism more international, less constrained by social pressures and more capable of chalange than ever before.
The sexual libertaion of the left has meant declining birthrates and the complete integration of western women into the capitalist structure for exploitation.
The rejection of classical leftism has meant an end for workers solidarity and agitation for the working class, and facilitated the replacement of the industrial labor jobs with a mass of easily replaceble work in the service and manajerial sectors.
The advocacy for anti-racism and the deconstruction of nationalism, has led to an opening of borders and increasing avalibility of cheap labor for capitalists to undercut their native workers.
The social radicalism of the New Left has been accepted and integrated into the capitalist system.
A deal with the Devil was made: the Left was given its liberation, its destruction of tradition and its sexualized culture; the capitalists gained a mass of easily pacified consumers without loyalty to their kin or any belief system which is fundamentally at odds with the ruling logic of capitalism. The universalism of the left has facilitated the globalist corporatism of late capitalism.
Through the useful idiots and cynical opportunists of the New Left, the capitalists found another way to revolutionize production and expand into uncharted territory, hitherto blocked off by traditional concerns of morality or national interest. The result has been a transfer of wealth from ordinary europeans to an increasingly small number of capitalist and a complete apathy of a mass of citizens, now mere consumers who have been reduced to a bovine kind of existence, with the constant provision of cheap consumer goods, necessary material comfort and an ever increasingly sexualized culture."

I hope this makes more sense.

>>18275839
Thank you anon.
I haven't had the time to add the following
Brooks Adams, Amaury de Riencourt, Tomislav Sunic, Volkmar Weiss , Lewis Mumford, Lothrop Stoddard, Madison Grant, Emil Cioran, Christopher Lasch, Nikolay Danilevsky, Ernst Jünger, Joseph Schumpeter, Joseph Campbell, Weineger, H. L. Mencken, Mitchell Heisman, Ted Kaczynski, Daniel Quinn, Bossuet, Curzio Malaparte, Louis de Bonald.
I'll do it now. Wait a bit for the updated list.