/lit/ - Literature

>>19535299
>This is Nietzsche?
Yes, and thanks for your response fren
>>19537668
<3
>>19538288
You may be right. Like in law, it is not allowed to corrupt the jury's view on the defendant by presenting irrelevant information that would paint them in a bad light because it could affect the jury's decision on the case. In a similar way, people will have made their minds up on a certain philosopher's ideas without having read them or while reading them.
As for your second point
>the worst readers are those who behave like plundering troops; they take away a few things they can use, dirty and confound the remainder and revile the whole

>>18732507

>>17908962
It’s from a different author, not maths lol
>>17908948
>filtered

>>17316674
I want to better understand existence, people, and the world around me. Also reading is a better waste of time than anything else, so I make sure to get a few hours in daily.