/lit/ - Literature

All the >muh science people in this thread should fuck off and read Feyerabend.
>mfw some nerd says "science has rendered philosophy irrelevant"

>>5988016

‘‘Leading intellectuals with their
zeal for objectivity... are criminals, not the liberators of mankind’’ - Feyerabend

So, do you still believe in objectivity?

>>3533803
"The withdrawal of philosophy into a "professional" shell of its own has had disastrous consequences. The younger generation of physicists, the Feynmans, the Schwingers, etc., may be very bright; they may be more intelligent than their predecessors, than Bohr, Einstein, Schrödinger, Boltzmann, Mach and so on. But they are uncivilized savages, they lack in philosophical depth – and this is the fault of the very same idea of professionalism which you are now defending."
Paul Feyerabend

>Undisputed #1: Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!
>mfw

>mfw /sci/ is mad

>>2476573
Here's what I think of your narratives.

Could someone who subscribes Feyerabend's view on Science being shitty/a religion, please give me an example?

I've been reading some of his stuff (not deeply, wank wank wank a lot of it) and I've been trying to find some examples where he shows the faults in real life.

inba /sci/ elitism

>>1128208

Problem?