/lit/ - Literature

>>20525885
>How come no argument for the existence of god is without fallacy?
ftfy

Good. Hopefully religion will follow.

>>20496207
Firstly, I would not call the bible a singular book, but a collection of books. This is especially important as the texts it contains were written and edited over a very long portion of time. Some texts fused with others, and some most likely removed from the canon per the Vatican's decision.
The bible is not my favourite 'book', in fact I actively make a decision to dislike it. When someone tells me how they 'love' reading the bible. Or how the bible 'changed their life', I assume they are mentally weak. That they are incapable of rational, independent thought. That they merely assume the thoughts of others without putting it through any filter or test being agreeing or disagreeing.
As for 'why' I dislike the bible, it is merely a matter or principle. I need not explain it to anyone. Especially to those who follow it around like a dog would follow its owner. If you must press me, I'll tell you this: "tongue my anus".