/lit/ - Literature

>>5509626
>Python is interpreted into C which is compiled to x86 assembly which is translated into straight binary
Python is most often never "compiled" but interpreted by a python interpreter which is already in binary form. The interpreter "acts on behalf of" the script written.

Also, while theoretically possible, nobody "interprets C".

Also, even if python scripts were translated to C, modern C compilers forgo assembly and generate the binary straight away.

>>5509683
>to really use python in practice one need to learn its libs or frameworks for the specific task
The libs are there for your convenience. Generally speaking you could write your own libs but it would probably take you longer than to learn how to use an existing lib, even if it's rather shitty. That's the point.
>Python is shit, Ruby rules
Enjoy your performance hits.