/lit/ - Literature

It's Infinite Jest you fucking cunt. Infinite. Jest. Not Infinitesimal, why would anyone write a book called Infinitesimal Jest? Do you even know who David Foster Wallace is? Get the fuck out of my house.

>>2718713
>explain to us how their misogynistic bawww poor me rambling about being rich but a girl doesnt like them is art in any way shape or form

>quote some passages that are deemed as beautiful because to me its just trash

From what work? What poet? What era? What tradition? Your idea that all poetry is generally the same thing only proves to me that you're completely ignorant of it and that you are indeed so stubborn in your aversion to beauty and art that you can only make vague and sweeping criticisms of something you don't understand at all.

>explain to us how their misogynistic bawww poor me rambling about being rich but a girl doesnt like them is art in any way shape or form

I really can't even fathom how stupid you are. Do you mean to say that love and rejection are purely luxuries of the rich and not universal? Do you only read things for the content with no concern at all toward the form? Are you retarded?

>>2718706
And you, I'll get to you in a minute.

>>2650787
In what way is insisting that all forms are restrictions not close-minded?

How is acknowledging that an artist doesn't see a canvas as a restriction but a means to an ends close-minded?

Are you entirely unaware that form does in fact serve a purpose and many poets, past and present, have and continue to use it to create or at least render beauty?

Or are you the sort who sees something, gets the general idea that he doesn't like it and, rather than sort out his vague feelings, levels a final and ignorant accusation without bothering to defend it in anyway?