[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22408565 [View]
File: 26 KB, 307x295, 1666615838916480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22408565

>>22408385

>> No.22074580 [View]
File: 26 KB, 307x295, 1656704819519448.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22074580

>>22074577

>> No.18874255 [View]
File: 26 KB, 307x295, 1622633815019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18874255

The thing he's being accused of would have happened almost 60 years ago. Even if it really did happen, it shouldn't be held against him at this point. Matters like this should be dealt with by a formal system of law that protects the rights of the innocent rather than by an outrage mob, and the law happens to have a concept of statutes of limitations for a reason. If it happened so long ago that even the law considers you absolved by time, then it shouldn't be held against you.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]