/lit/ - Literature

>>21774957
Just want to add, it's not correct to say "based off", it's an indication that the speaker is a confused millennial or, even worse, zoomer. The correct usage is always "based on".

>>21054704
This is a very sad and naive take, so I guess you're a woman or a california fat bearded glassses having white guy. All around the world people are very similiar and the same type of archetypes are in every single fucking place regardless of culture. Women are not a variety of different people at their core, the wave that they are. They vary as much as their genetic code does, which is not much at all.

t.guy who spoke to at least a million people all around the world for it contracting job and lived in a variety of zones.

>>20949091

It's hilarious to see how beyond dead my libido is now after being such a coomer until a few years ago.
Very relieving too.

WAOW! A PHILOSOPHY UNDERGRAD!

every book I've ever read was already based off of a popular movie. does anyone want to talk about books with movie adaptions. what are your favourites. I just finished Red Dragon, I thought it was really good

The Hackett Complete Works of Plato at 1800 pages

Why do people spend time to read something as frivolous and stupid as genre fiction? Do they know they're reading the written equivalent of teenage comics?