[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22085913 [View]
File: 57 KB, 548x676, 1657427442883.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22085913

>>22085846
>>hates the world
Guenon didn't teach that you should hate the world and he didnt do so himself.

From where does this strawman of "hating the world" come from? Are you being induced by your emotions to strawman that great Sufi Shaykh and teacher?

>> No.21716460 [View]
File: 57 KB, 548x676, 1657427442883.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21716460

>>21712532
>Lastly, the Buddhistic assumption that the extinction of that consciousness is the highest end of human life, is untenable, for there is no recipient of results. For a person who has got a thorn stuck into him, the relief of the pain caused by it is the result (he seeks); but if he dies, we do not find any recipient of the resulting cessation of pain. Similarly, if consciousness is altogether extinct and there is nobody to reap that benefit, to talk of it as the highest end of human life is meaningless. If that very entity or self, designated by the word ‘person’—consciousness, according to you—whose well-being is meant, is extinct, for whose sake will the highest end be? But those who believe in a self different from consciousness and witnessing many objects, will find it easy to explain all phenomena such as the remembrance of things previously seen and the contact and cessation of pain—the impurity, for instance, being ascribed to contact with extraneous things, and the purification to dissociation from them.

- Sri Śaṅkarācārya (pbuh), Bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣadbhāṣya 4.3.7.

>> No.21444322 [View]
File: 57 KB, 548x676, 1657427442883.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21444322

>>21444175
>Knowledge is only conceptual
At the moment when the concept is known, does the concept have it's own locus of sentience that witnesses itself, or is there an awareness present which knows and reveals the concept? Is that awareness itself at the moment when it's present alongside the concept as the knower, itself another concept? Think about that for a while and you may begin to understand what non-conceptual knowledge is and why concepts are not needed to have immediate knowledge of ourselves.

>> No.20655749 [View]
File: 57 KB, 548x676, Guenon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20655749

Reminder to Ignore all pseudointellectual rhetoriticians and instead go and read the complete works of Śaṅkarācārya, Guénon, al-Ġazālī, Plotinus, Abhinavagupta, Ibn ʿArabi, Jñāneśvar, Plato, Böhme, Kabīr, Ismāʿīl Ḥaḳḳī al-Brūsawī, Ānandavardhana, Iamblichus, Najmuddīn-e Kubrā, Palamas, Dattatreya, Gauḍapāda, Dölpopa, Han Yu, Mulla Sadrā, Coomaraswamy, Vaśiṣṭha, Bonaventure, Sanā'ī, Vyāsa, Ya'qūb al-Sijistānī, Vidyāraṇya, Longchenpa, Kṣemarāja, Damascius, Gurū Nānak, Baba Afzal, Śrīharṣa, Laozi, Matsyendranātha, Porphyry, Jāmī, Meister Eckhart, Madhusūdana Sarasvatī, Zhuangzi, ibn Khaldūn, Syrianus, Frithjof Schuon, Asaṅga, Bhaṭṭa Kallaṭa, Suhrawardī, van Ruysbroec, Kūkai, Jean Borella, Bādarāyaṇa, Clement of Alexandria, Vālmīki, Nṛsimhāshrama, Qutb al-Din al-Shirazi, Gorakhnath, Eriugena, Nisargadatta Maharaj, Ramana Maharshi, Hariharanand Saraswati, Chitsukha, Qūnawī, Somananda, Rangjung Dorje, Patañjali, Namdev, Aṭṭār, Rāmānujā, Shao Yong, Uždavinys and Ibn Bājja.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]