[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.12608823 [View]
File: 346 KB, 888x928, 1550272022362.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12608823

The biggest cruel trick ever pulled on men was raising this past generation (or two) to think that women are Disney princess "manic pixie dream girls" who will provide meaning and joy to yoyur life while somehow also being full intellectual and spiritual equals AND sexual partners when necessary.

The sexual objects part is true, but only insofar as they are solely sexual objects at their real core, disgusting animals who exist sell themselves like a cheap commodity to other disgusting animals (horny men with tribal tattoos grunting and saying things like NNGHH YEAH BABY YOU LIKE DADDY'S COCK WHORE YEAH). Not only do they not mind being worn-out and used-up pieces of chattel, they exist in a perpetual dual state, worshipped as goddesses by pathetic beta cucks they despise on the one hand, and willingly, eagerly pissed and spit on by Chad on the other. The more betas worship women, the more they crave the subversion of this worship in the form of Chad shitting on their tits and punching them in the face. There is no in-between. If you want a woman to be your equal, she will be confused by you as a "middle term" that cannot logically exist. Worse, actually, she'll just slot you in the Beta category by default, because anyone who isn't a mindlessly aggressive silverback gorilla who wants to punch her in the face and choke her is ipso facto a beta slave tampon to be used up and tossed aside.

The Disney princess thing is a horrifying outgrowth of the beta/princess phenomenon. It's what happens when you let infantilized pussy betas run the whole society, and they systemically degrade masculine virtues and elevate the beta/princess archetypes as if they are the only forms really existing.

The equals thing doesn't even need to be deconstructed, it's such a joke. Schopenhauer already did it:
>And it was in this light that the ancients and people of the East regarded woman; they recognised her true position better than we, with our old French ideas of gallantry and absurd veneration, that highest product of Christian-Teutonic stupidity. These ideas have only served to make them arrogant and imperious, to such an extent as to remind one at times of the holy apes in Benares, who, in the consciousness of their holiness and inviolability, think they can do anything and everything they please. [F]or woman, rightly named by the ancients sexus sequior, is by no means fit to be the object of our honour and veneration, or to hold her head higher than man and to have the same rights as he. ... The European lady, strictly speaking, is a creature who should not exist at all; but there ought to be housekeepers, and young girls who hope to become such; and they should be brought up not to be arrogant, but to be domesticated and submissive. It is exactly because there are ladies in Europe that women of a lower standing, that is to say, the greater majority of the sex, are much more unhappy than they are in the East.

>> No.12603911 [View]
File: 346 KB, 888x928, Untitled_0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12603911

>>12603549
Not quite

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]