/lit/ - Literature

>>9186694
Thanks m8.

I'm trying to get a solid methodology on how to approach truth, reality, ideas, etc. and I get "triggered" when I see someone say an "is" description of reality that is unsubstantiated. If it's in the realm of opinion and discovery, it's all good.

Truth statements of reality need to be approached much differently than opinion, and I still haven't figured out the exact methodology.
"4chan is a shithole" is much different than "I think 4chan is a shithole." I think the incorrect approach to opinion vs fact can cause massive disasters, hence my apprehension to ones who don't make the distinction.

I also have a bias against post-modernists or subjectivists and such, even though I have not read them or understand them, so approaching the subject is emotionally and defensively charged.

If you share the good things the post-modernists have to offer without manipulation, I thank you for your service. Who knows, the problem might be me.