/lit/ - Literature

SPOOPY XDDD

>>9059225
Hey congrats on actually reading him.

It might be a tad early but what do you think Stirner means when he talks about the creative nothing and what do you understand his conception of property to be? these are probably some of the most important parts of understanding his work

>It's hard to propose a counter-argument when your entire philosophy can be summed up in the pithy three word slogan "Everything is Nothing".

Stirner's philosophy is better summed up as "I have interests separate to ideas". Likewise all you need to do to refute him is attack his nominalism which is far from bulletproof.

>You always know who the intellectual child is in a conversation if he pulls the "u cant know nuffin" -card. Same with Stirnerism. It is anti-philosophy.

Not at all indeed once you get past the meme version of him on lit you will see that he is a pretty serious philosopher whose works were building on Hegels thought (another way to attack/refute Stirner)