/lit/ - Literature

>>2035907
Am I being trolled?

>>1995164
>You take that risk under any system. There's always the potential for an unpopular law or application of a law to provoke violence.

Conveniently you neglect to mention how much easier that is without a centralized government. If there's a state with an army civil war is much less likely.

>The rest of your post is too stupid to reply to. You don't seem quite capable of reading words and understanding what they mean.

This isn't even close to an argument and could be recycled to fit any post.

You say:
>A disagreement over the law or finding of fact could result in a feud, but you had basically no hope of going against what was obvious to anyone or playing lawyer games with technicalities.
>you had no hope of going against what was obvious to anyone

If you are a monopoly with your own private army you do have a hope against going against the obvious. If one measly powerless person in your anarcho-capitalist dystopia is mistreated by a monopoly with a private army he is flat out fucked. Who will he appeal to without a centralized judicial system? And if there is one and military isn't centralized, there's no force behind the judicial system's decisions. As long as a monopoly can afford a powerful private army, it becomes an unstoppable despot.

Unless you left huge holes in your original statement which would explain for this obvious error, I am left to believe that this system is extremely flawed and the reason it never existed anywhere or anytime outside of medieval Ireland is because it was fucking stupid.

>this is perfectly legitimate works of literature
>They focus mostly on incest and underage

A truly noble pursuit OP.