/lit/ - Literature

>>15852403
>you appear to believe that because he used the words "democratic socialism" he agrees with whatever wikipedia trannies say that "democratic socialism" means.
Lol, it’s democratic ownership of the workplace by the workers. The abolition of capitalism. That has always been what Democratic Socialism meant. I don’t know what your definition is, but it’s wrong. Maybe you are confusing it with social democracy? Either way, you need to do a lot more reading before you come on here and talk about things you know nothing about.

Let’s get the facts straight real quick.
>Self Identifies as a democratic socialist, an ideology which desires worker ownership of production by definition
>wrote books talking about how good worker ownership of production is
And still you deny it. Why?

>>15840672
>a convenient lie
Anytime I run into somebody who doesn’t believe in anything supernatural, I actually laugh out loud. I literally can’t comprehend going through life without experiencing anything paranormal it happens so often, it’s amazing to think that there are actually people who have never experienced these things.

>>15839949
>By advanced practitioner you mean someone who spent enough of their time reading/talking about this concept so that during actual oobe they see something that resembles it?
No, I mean people who regularly visit the spirit realm and communicate with entities. But with some entities, researching them can attract them.

>it? If by an advanced practitioner you mean someone who experienced a lot of oobes then just read trip reports on any psychedelics forum and you'll see that experienced people encounter things that don't resemble this "Astral Plane" whatsoever
Psychedelic Drugs do not help with spirituality as much as you think. You need to do these things sober to truly master them.

88 replies in and nobody's said Lolita

>The Road
>Science Fiction

Name a single thing in that book that can be adequately described as "science fiction". Post-apocalyptic literature is not necessarily "science fiction". There's not even anything in this book that suggests the tropes of any sci fi novel. The cause for the catastrophe is deliberately left unstated because that's not at all the point.

And it's not even a post-apocalpytic novel, because the POST part implies that the story takes place AFTER an apocalyptic event.

The whole point of The Road, and why it isn't a post-apocalyptic novel, is that there is no POST-anything. The world is dying, there's not going to be anyone living on the planet in a few decades.

You people are so fucking stupid, I swear to god

>>9357502
>kindle

Post the last three books you read or are currently reading. Other /lit/fags will r8.
I'll start (go ahead and destroy me):
>Lisey's Story - Stephen King
>Black House - Stephen King & Peter Straub
>End of Watch - Stephen King

>>8477916
>The monster is too horrible to be comprehended by our senses

>>7378081
>>7378460

>>5842627
>Paradise Lost
>The prose itself is good enough to just read on its own
>The prose itself is good enough
>The prose itself
>The prose
>prose