/lit/ - Literature

>>15717794
>Because I assumed you are an ancom or some other such retard.
No I adhere to whatever political philosophy is beneficial for myself at that time but generally sympathize with the left as my class interest correlates generally to that of my ego
>How do you live then? how does one participate on society?
The social contract must be followed or else we fell into chaos and nothing gets done.
I live a relatively normal life always acting in within my self interest, I fully reject morality and property and would be willing to break any taboo if it was to my benefit in the long term

>>12006215
>referring to My Unique with a fixed abstract term such as "leftist"

You cannot define my Unique, it is the Creative Nothing, constantly changing to better ascend itself and further My Cause.

To lump me in with your pathetic ideologies that have no use to me and are not of my concern is the pinnacle of arrogance and ignorance.


Don't talk to Me, My Ego or My Own ever again you spooky fuck

>>11771028
I truly believe that a synthesis between Max Stirner and Martin Heidegger would truly enlighten the world of both the "creative nothing" and "Dasein" as a singular concept with an expansive essence that is found in all individuals.

Also:

Although my own form is bound to the same worldly fate to become taken by Das Nichts, I shall continue on regardless of how tight fates vice is on my own life. I am alive at this moment and I will proclaim my struggle to the world and all its ill begotten vermin like me!

Tell it to me straight. Is this guy a meme or is his work actually worth something? Where should I start?

Did Stirner really intend for "spook" to be such a catch-all or was that just a byproduct of his flawed logic?

>It's a "people are so retarded that they're going to start flinging shit at each other for no good reason the moment there isn't a sword to their necks" post.
Ever thought the reason chaos breaks out the moment the state is down isn't because people are instinctively evil but because they have been brought up in a system that blueballs them from the moment they are born and that the reason they can be so vicious is because they are so desperate that they won't have a second thought if given the chance to grasp even a fraction of all the paradises they have been promised and told to want all of their lives?

Just saying.

>>8492419
They all have an admirable time of it when they receive zealous homage. Just observe the nation that is defended by devoted patriots. The patriots fall in bloody battle or in the fight with hunger and want; what does the nation care for that? By the manure of their corpses the nation comes to "its bloom"! The individuals have died "for the great cause of the nation," and the nation sends some words of thanks after them and – has the profit of it. I call that a paying kind of egoism.

But only look at that Sultan who cares so lovingly for his people. Is he not pure unselfishness itself, and does he not hourly sacrifice himself for his people? Oh, yes, for "his people." Just try it; show yourself not as his, but as your own; for breaking away from his egoism you will take a trip to jail. The Sultan has set his cause on nothing but himself; he is to himself all in all, he is to himself the only one, and tolerates nobody who would dare not to be one of "his people."

And will you not learn by these brilliant examples that the egoist gets on best? I for my part take a lesson from them, and propose, instead of further unselfishly serving those great egoists, rather to be the egoist myself.

God and mankind have concerned themselves for nothing, for nothing but themselves. Let me then likewise concern myself for myself, who am equally with God the nothing of all others, who am my all, who am the only one.

If God, if mankind, as you affirm, have substance enough in themselves to be all in all to themselves, then I feel that I shall still less lack that, and that I shall have no complaint to make of my "emptiness." I am not nothing in the sense of emptiness, but I am the creative nothing, the nothing out of which I myself as creator create everything.

Away, then, with every concern that is not altogether my concern! You think at least the "good cause" must be my concern? What’s good, what’s bad? Why, I myself am my concern, and I am neither good nor bad. Neither has meaning for me.

The divine is God’s concern; the human, man’s. My concern is neither the divine nor the human, not the true, good, just, free, etc., but solely what is mine, and it is not a general one, but is – unique, as I am unique.

Nothing is more to me than myself!