/lit/ - Literature

>>3303402

>tfw I was referring to the empitness of intellect and spirit, and not some tedious mathematical concept of nothingness.

>>3264693

Poppycock sir!

Now I must away to the study. There is a manuscript I have to detail.

>>1550329
Oh.. and OP: Stop being the common computer illiterate literaturefag
and resize your images before uploading.

>>1062295
>>1062338
ITT: Pseudo-intellectuals who have never appreciated a work of poetry and are insecure about it. You sound like the same people who "hurr durr reading is for ppl hoo can't think 4 themselves not like me lol."

Also OP's idea is completely fucking retarded. A movie would rank higher than a book by those standards. Hell, some stupid bitch could claim to be a performance artist and say her life is her art. It's more difficult to live than to write, ask Hemingway.
Saged for idiocy.

>>802099
You just keep on proving my point.

>>767772

its nice that they wont steal your car i guess
>>767775

im with bernard-shaw, apostrophes are useless

>>767776

pic related

yes please do /lit/

For all you who say "/lit/ is full of pretentious college students" you have to realize that we, the accused, have a reason to be pretentious.

In today's world there are so many dumb people doing dumb things. It is my duty as an intelligent individual to do intelligent things. Since I do these things, am I not entitled to act intelligent or superior? The idiots of the world act, or rather are, dumb, so why can't I act like myself as well? If I am smart, why not show people?

>>550293
read two books about two different things, you cant read book 2 and book 3 of lord of the rings at the same time dipshit

>>505290