/lit/ - Literature

>>22859397
>why do you have to jump through so many hoops to get laid
You don't. He's just retarded.

>>11736564
>implying sex can't be meaningless for both the man and the woman
Clearly this poster is a virgin, or at least woefully inexperienced.

>>11189237
There are dozens of responses to this.
>"They are consensual, you signed the social contract." — t. Hobbes
>"The naive Liberal conception of consent makes no sense unless we can first establish a robust conception of free will (which can't be done)." — t. Philosophers of the Mind and Naturalist Authors
>"The NAP is no more valid a system of ethics than the Categorical Imperative or the Maximization of Happiness or the Word of God." — t. Moral Nihilists
The entire history of philosophy is full of reasons why this argument is wrong.