/lit/ - Literature

IT HAS OCCURRED TO ME THAT PERHAPS THEIR TELOS, OR PART OF IT, IS TO SERVE AS A PROXY FOR THE ABSOLUTE SCIENTIFIC/INTELLECTUAL CHARLATANRY; CARDINAL OBSTACLE THAT MUST BE RESOLVED & OVERCOME, BUT THAT NOTION SEEMS OVERLY SIMPLISTIC & VULGAR.

>>4499173
>Thing is I'm still somewhat iffy with DeLillo.

ME ALSO.

I HAVE READ "COSMOPOLIS"; I OVERLY LIKE IT IN EVERY ASPECT, BUT I SUSPECT THAT DON DELILLO HIMSELF HAS "MARXIST" TENDENCIES AND IS POLITICALLY "LEFTIST", AND THAT HE IS AESTHETICALLY INCONSISTENT IN HIS "WORKS".

WOULD SOMEONE SAAVY REGARDING DON DELILLO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS?:

1. WHAT ARE DON DELILLO'S POLITICAL TENDENCIES?

2. ARE HIS OTHER "WORKS" AESTHETICALLY SIMILAR TO "COSMOPOLIS"?

>"HARD REALISM".

IT IS SO OBVIOUS, THAT IT IS EMBARRASSING THAT SOMEONE WOULD MAKE GRAPH OF IT.

I "SOLVED" THAT CONUNDRUM WHEN I WAS TWELVE YEARS OF AGE, IMPROMPTU, WHILST TALKING WITH A CLASSMATE.

I TOLD HIM THE "SOLUTION", AND HE LOOKED AT MY FACE WITH WHAT I INFER WAS WONDER.

HE WAS, BY "POPULAR OPINION", "THE MOST INTELLIGENT ONE" IN THE CLASS.

>>3610089

THOSE PROTRUSIONS ON THE BUILDING ARE SENSELESS, AESTHETICALLY & PRAGMATICALLY; A "CONCEPTUALLY"/INTELLECTUALLY DECADENT DESIGN, MOST PROBABLY BY A JEW.

"SCHIZOTYPAL PERSONALITY DISORDER" IS A FABRICATED ILLNESS TO LABEL "NTs" WHO ARE DETRIMENTALLY AFFECTED BY THEIR ENVIRONMENTS IN SOME MANNER.

THE FABRICATION OF ILLNESSES, AND "DISORDERS" IS JUST ANOTHER METHOD OF "SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION" BY ZIONISTS VIA "CULTURAL MARXISM".

"PLAY".

>>3066258

THAT IS WHAT OCCURS WHEN MOST USERS ARE PRETENTIOUS "POSERS" WHO BELIEVE THAT CITING "ARTICLES", OR OTHER EXTERNAL SOURCES, INSTEAD OF STATING A PERSONAL OPINION, DENOTES INTELLECT, OR KNOWLEDGE.

THE IRONY IS THAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE THAT IT ACTUALLY DENOTES THE OPPOSITE.

MOST USERS IN /lit/ ARE OVERLY "SHALLOW", LACK INTUITION, AND ARE "CULTURAL MARXISTS".

IN NO SPECIFIC ORDER:

JEROME DAVID SALINGER.

JULIUS EVOLA.

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE.

OSAMU DAZAI.

AYN RAND.

LEWIS CARROLL.

WILLIAM GIBSON.

L. FRANK BAUM.

VLADIMIR NABOKOV.

MAX STIRNER.

>>2803661
>Height is an inheritable trait, it's just influenced by environment, just like 99% of inheritable traits which are genetic.

FIRSTLY, ALL TRAITS ARE GENETIC, OBVIOUSLY.

SECONDLY, ONLY A MINORITY OF TRAITS ARE INFLUENCED BY ENVIRONMENT, NOT THE ALLEGED NINETY PERCENT (90%) THAT YOU CLAIM; A PERCENTAGE WHICH YOU JUST CAME UP WITH, APPARENTLY.

>>2644924
>depressing in an introverted way

WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?

>>2566834

I INFER THAT YOU ARE A LIBERAL.

I DID NOT THINK THAT YOU WERE A LIBERAL UNTIL NOW.

>ENTER A BOOKSHOP.
>CLERK(S) GLANCE AT ME AND ASK "CAN I HELP YOU?", OR "ARE YOU LOOKING FOR SOMETHING IN PARTICULAR?"

>DOWNLOAD BOOK.
>IT HAS A URL AT THE TOP OF EVERY TWO PAGES.

>I AM APPROXIMATELY SEVEN YEARS OF AGE.
>FATHER "LENDS" MY NONFICTION BOOKS RE "PARANORMAL SUBJECTS".
>FATHER "LENDS" ME "SELFHELPS BOOKS", AND OTHER BOOKS RE "HOW TO KNOW PERSONS BY THEIR APPEARANCE".
>FATHER KEEPS "LENDING" ME THAT KIND OF BOOKS.
>I NEVER READ ANY OF THAT "GARBAGE" BECAUSE I AM NOT INTERESTED IN THAT.

AT LEAST I HAVE TO THANK HIM GETTING ME INTRODUCED TO READING.

BECAUSE OF THE "GARBAGE" THAT HE "LENT" ME I SOUGHT TO READ ABOUT SUBJECTS THAT INTERESTED ME.

ALTHOUGH, THE BOOKS RE "PARANORMAL SUBJECTS" DID INTERESTED ME.

>>2472867

I SMILED, THEN I CHUCKLED.

>>2469169

COPE WITH IT.

EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE.

YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS PATHETICALLY CLAIMING "PLAGIARISM".

>>2459848

>IMPLYING THAT THE FIRST PART OF WHAT THE ORIGINAL POSTER POSTED IS NOT A FACT.

I READ OSAMU DAZAI'S WORKS IN ENGLISH.

I DO NOT CARE IF "SOMETHING" IS "LOST" IN TRANSLATION, THEY ARE STILL RELATIVELY POIGNANT.

>>2362308

THEN NONE OF THEM ARE "EUROCENTRIC".

>>2343598

IMAGES ARE INDEED SUBJECT TO RELATIVE INTERPRETATION.

YOU LACK INTUITION.