/lit/ - Literature

1. A simulator can't simulate something that is logically impossible in its own world (we cannot simulate a square circle, or a non-existent object)
2. A simulated universe is contingent on another universe (this can be simulation chains)

1&2-> 3. simulated universes conform to the same logic as their simulator universes

2 -> A simulation chain of any number must be ontologically grounded in one non-contingent simulator universe (no infinite regress)

2&3 -> our universe, for all intents and purposes, is the non-contingent universe, as it must conform to the same rules as the simulator universe, and the simulator universe is non-contingent. Introducing layers of contingent simulations is unnecessary, adding nothing of significance. Therefore we can reject simulation theory as overdetermined.

>Oi's a regalar bloke jus' loike me!

>>12706907
>>Silent h (e.g. human, huge)
'ate pseuds
'ate prescriptivists
'ate off topic threads