/lit/ - Literature

>>19789664
>>19789666
>>19789658
>>19789671
cope

>>19482501
>USSR, Cuba, CPC, DPRK, Vietnam
>B-B-BUT THEY HAVE A CAPITALIST MODE OF PRODUCTION
Yes. Read Marx (and Engels).
>What we have to deal with here [in analyzing the programme of the workers' party] is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it comes.

>And the modern state, again, is only the organisation that bourgeois society takes on in order to support the general external conditions of the capitalist mode of production against the encroachments as well of the workers as of individual capitalists. The modern state, no matter what its form, is essentially a capitalist machine, the state of the capitalists, the ideal personification of the total national capital. The more it proceeds to the taking over of productive forces, the more does it actually become the national capitalist, the more citizens does it exploit. The workers remain wage-workers — proletarians. The capitalist relation is not done away with. It is rather brought to a head. But, brought to a head, it topples over. State ownership of the productive forces is not the solution of the conflict, but concealed within it are the technical conditions that form the elements of that solution.
>This solution can only consist in the practical recognition of the social nature of the modern forces of production, and therefore in the harmonising of the modes of production, appropriation, and exchange with the socialised character of the means of production And this can only come about by society openly and directly taking possession of the productive forces which have outgrown all control except that of society as a whole. The social character of the means of production and of the products today reacts against the producers, periodically disrupts all production and exchange, acts only like a law of nature working blindly, forcibly, destructively. But with the taking over by society of the productive forces, the social character of the means of production and of the products will be utilised by the producers with a perfect understanding of its nature, and instead of being a source of disturbance and periodical collapse, will become the most powerful lever of production itself.

>>19458848
Read everything right here:

https://archive.org/details/@dutchmzt

>>17912507
Take your meds

>>15726522
It depends the characteristics

>>15410285
You mean socialism with chinese characteristics

>>14141382
https://www.amazon.com/Tiananmen-Massacre-Evidence-Disinformation-Humanity/dp/1494326590

>>13604531
It has the same basis as all religion.

http://www.bannedthought.net/International/RIM/AWTW/2002-28/28_Islam.htm

>>13540609
>The Communist Party of China has abandoned Communism for pragmatism.
I think you mean Socialism with Chinese characteristics