/lit/ - Literature

>>16113477
Kek how autistic do you have to be to feel "rage" at people not eating animals. You only need to read the summary to refute this book:
>exposes the destructive history of agriculture
Their suggestion that agriculture should be local is good, but they've made a very typical mistake of thinking animals just photosynthesise and don't need the destructive practice of agriculture themselves to grow (at a highly inefficient rate). There is one good argument for meat eating that very few are bold enough to make: chinks are the only ethical meat eaters by virtue of having no delusions as to the ethics of eating cows compared to dogs. Also hunting is cool.