/lit/ - Literature

>>22604436
How can you say that I didn't read the sophist when I'm the one who had to remind you who the main speaker is in the dialogue, and I've been the first one to mention things like the parricide? I think I've made myself pretty clear, I do appreciate the method they use for locating a particular detail of reality and for initially interpreting "is not", but I don't like the latter part where it goes off into the realm of falsehood as non-being and whatever else takes place at the end there. I'm not rereading the dialogue to counter some vague accusation that maybe I haven't read it.

Maybe you can wait to plonk down some money and buy the enormous eleatic tome that I have written. Literally hundreds of pages of pure wisdom and truth. I am sure it will reveal that I have a solid understanding of the sophist, or else you can stain the book with highlighter and point out where I supposedly go wrong.

But I'm telling you, I've solved metaphysics and by extension all of philosophy, and that's just how it is.

>>22418026
Be sure to let me know when you actually identify a problem and develop the ability to communicate it!

>>22408926
Dualism is a disease that renders people incapable of forming coherent thoughts.

>>22311056
Interesting stuff. Next time you post at me in a thread, I hope you'll say something more meaningful. You have to do better.