[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18993832 [View]
File: 68 KB, 750x748, ErxowjIXEAM4p65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18993832

>>18993771
>Good. Women are inferior.
An underclass of 34 million incels isn't good for stability.

>Last month watched pic related. Kino.
Don't care about "muh indie movies." America has those and has Hollywood.

>Why is this relevant?
Everyone wants to be American. No one wants to be Chinese.

>Low IQ, poor insight
Says the guy who thinks having an incel underclass is sustainable

>The fact that you imply that "conservatives" a.k.a trumptards are any better suggests that you are a /pol/ tourist.
Not a /pol/tard, trumpism and conservatism as they are today aren't serious solutions to present issues. The way forward is adopting what worked against the USSR: militarism, traditionalism, capitalism. Or in one word: neoconservatism.

>> No.17968591 [View]
File: 68 KB, 750x748, ErxowjIXEAM4p65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17968591

>>17965112
I made pic related about a year ago. The answer is simple: the Gramscian March consisted of liberals purging institutions of any conservatives whenever possible, which led to a dramatic decline in conservative influence. As well, corporations have realized that identity politics and other forms of virtue-signaling will distract people from their centralization of national industry and betrayal of middle America to the Chinese. That's how you get LuLuLemon hosting seminars on "how to resist capitalism."

There are multiple groups seeking a restoration of conservatism: The Claremont Review is one I'd recommend.

https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/digital/an-interview-with-norman-podhoretz/

Eventually, after doing some thinking, I came to the conclusion that the only way *out* of conservatism's current decadent state, and therefore America's current decadent state, is the adoption of a certain thesis that has worked well in the past. Neoconservatism. Here's some reading:

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/irving-kristol/civil-liberties-1952-a-study-in-confusiondo-we-defend-our-rights-by-protecting-communists/

https://www.nytimes.com/1971/03/28/archives/pornography-obscenity-and-the-case-for-censorship-pornography.html

https://delong.typepad.com/egregious_moderation/2009/10/irving-kristol-my-cold-war-april-1-1993.html

https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/jeane-kirkpatrick/dictatorships-double-standards/

Check out the subreddit when you're ready for America's political future (yes le plebbit sucks, but most of the sub's users use it and no other part of reddit, and it's the best spot for under-the-radar political organizing online).

>> No.17960021 [View]
File: 68 KB, 750x748, ErxowjIXEAM4p65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17960021

>>17957203
>what can I do other than seethe that I was born in the wrong season?

Realize that at the worst, you're in autumn. Far more likely, history actually isn't cyclical and grand historical narratives obscure reality. There's 0 reason Western civ can't pull itself out of all its conundrum. We just need something to rally around.

If only there were an ideology that denounces decadence, advocates national virility, pushes for victory on a multi-continental scale, and has won bipolar competitions in the past.

Oh wait. Pic related.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]