/lit/ - Literature

>>6711562
It was consistent I guess. Not exactly Christian, but what are ye gunna do? Poetic at its low points and what I hope is only skepticism of correct grammatical constructions, like some venting of rage against the newspeak machine of the 21st C.

Metaphysical? Noooope. Materialist? Noooope. High Romanticism? Noooope. Let us celebrate in praise of breaking all barriers of expectation by explicitly limboing beneath them. When I praised the other posts, genius, and talent came like masters of nuance, and here I fall flatly sputtering nothing for you.

Discussing yr post, at best, I grimly admired your hope that anyone besides me would slog through it.

Be proud of your limitations. I accepted your implied invitation, but cannot remember ever seeing something so, so—well I'm still very young and the 1990s are done and I'm hopelessly passionate about writing good—I mean well.