[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21553762 [View]
File: 149 KB, 882x799, 1673902155667614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21553762

Daily reminder Orberg is a retard on every level

His book claims to teach the "natural method, it doesn't, yet his book fails to do this. First it aims to teach the new version of that but fails to do so since he doesn't seem to understand or innately believes its impossible to learn from so his book ends up like some monster made of different ways that doesn't know what its actually meant to do.

And he doesn't aim to teach using the actual natural method which looks like this. This book is by the one of the people that helped popularise the term in the 1800s and as you can see it is just an interlinear book.

>> No.21534820 [View]
File: 149 KB, 882x799, 1673900775590359.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21534820

Daily reminder Orberg is a retard on every level

His book claims to teach the "natural method, it doesn't, yet his book fails to do this. First it aims to teach the new version of that but fails to do so since he doesn't seem to understand or innately believes its impossible to learn from so his book ends up like some monster made of different ways that doesn't know what its actually meant to do.

And he doesn't aim to teach using the actual natural method which looks like this. This book is by the one of the people that helped popularise the term in the 1800s and as you can see it is just an interlinear book.

>> No.21534725 [View]
File: 149 KB, 882x799, naturalmethod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21534725

This is what the "natural" method looks like according to the people that actually invented the term

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]