/lit/ - Literature

>>23296243
It's this one.

>>23296614
Not him, but at that point one is just redefining cowardice to mean something much more conceited. And this is a different cowardice than what is portrayed in Verjovenski.
And really, you are also redefining weakness as something far more obtuse. Weakness is not a physical quality to you, it's the failure to live up to "virtue" and "good".