[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17288620 [View]
File: 103 KB, 640x433, confederacy_of_dunces.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17288620

>>17288373
You sound like Ignatius

>> No.16791928 [View]
File: 103 KB, 640x433, confederacy_of_dunces.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16791928

I have never seen /lit/ discuss Confederacy of Dunces. Why not? This book is an American comedic gem.

>> No.2883397 [View]
File: 103 KB, 640x433, confederacy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2883397

>>2883340
>>2883393

>> No.2677751 [View]
File: 103 KB, 640x433, confederacy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2677751

Hey /lit/, I browse here occasionally and I never see any critique threads, and, checking back the last 5 pages and the neet catalogue, I don't really see any critique threads for short stories that we've written.

I've been trying to get some feedback on my style and prose lately after writing I think sums up to a fairly decent short story. I've gotten some glowing reception from friends, but 4chan tends to give criticism that I can work with better than the opinions of friends.

I know it's a bit long; the most I want out of any of you is to scan my prose, word choices, stuff like that and tell me if I'm shit and my story is shit (and especially why). Similarly, anything you guys want to share, I'll give my thoughts.

Here's the googledocs of it. Thanks in advance.
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cldIG0acGkN6Fmg3V8SPgQ1UwrEVYwYWIYYOIjiOy1g/edit

Pic related in the sense that it's what I'm reading right now, really enjoyable and pretty fucking funny. You're welcome to discuss that if you'd rather.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]