/lit/ - Literature

Any good?

>>8752481
Clearly this.

This is treading on cognitive psychology but I'm of the school that morals are the mere asymmetrical matrix on which we make decisions. The inner characteristics of a human do not even matter, in fact I can find you classic studies where only a .30 correlation was found between the prior inner beliefs and in successfully predicting the outcome.
This is called a Fundamental Attribution Error, and the flaw in OP's thinking is that his choices actually matter all that much at all. As human beings we all make similar decisions based on the environments that we are placed in and the circumstances that appear.

So when you say you do not have morals you are lying because everyone takes some sort of inner beliefs to a decision, even if it only has a lighter correlation for the outcome.

The moral of the story is that OP doesn't truly understand what morality is at all, mistakenly thinking that it is something you cannot have. But he is wrong. When he goes into a decision he bases his decision at least partially off his past experiences and personality predispositions. This is a human trait. Nobody is without it.

>>6938839
>>6938753
dont tell me you guys are so retarded you don't know frankenstein's title is the modern prometheus

nobody is that dumb, right?
maybe I should just leave if the consensus is this fucking daft