/lit/ - Literature

>>19292495
omg! make sure you read up on F. Gardner, Gaddis + Squick

>>18291787
The commonsensical reader might think so. Thus is he using philosophy as a literary device to create an image of himself, perhaps, a scholar?

The only way to remove the problems is to conclude he meant what he said: “I know nothing.” What is “nothing”? and there is one more problem – would Wittgenstein really be writing all those papers if he had no knowledge? Did he have another life as a doctor or a notary public?

>>Not Bill Murray posted things that only somebody who had met Pynchon would know

Go on...