/lit/ - Literature

>>4805930


please, the 'status-quo' is already defined by revolutionary memes, and is not nearly radical enough.

>>4790451


mental paralysis is the natural result of such a mind-set taken seriously, turning from beings, to not-beings.

but of course, you are not really paralyzed, because not even you really believe this.

consider this, people like peter singer are sometimes useful. striding ahead with autistic conviction down the narrow blinders of their favored intellectual construction, taking the (il)logic to their natural conclusions, and thus inadvertently disclosing something good.

which is in singers case, of course we are 'speciesist', and a whole lot of other ists too. how is it possible for us to do any one thing over any other thing? how have you chosen to post in this thread instead of any other possible option? just so, judgment is fundamental to cognition (who knows, maby one day humanity too will occupy the dustbin of history, supplanted by our superior children).

in any case, a categorical imperative against 'bias' whatsoever does not hold. the question then becomes, which kind of bias?

>>4757362


try to be more understanding, most everyone cant *help* but miss something, and for some, having someone do the thinking for them is preferable (or by various ways [le althusser face], inevitable).

>>4744787

It created him.

This is an answer to both questions.