[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18090163 [View]
File: 60 KB, 900x900, ourgirlursulaincolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18090163

>>18090087
Fair enough but i thought i should state my feelings as openly as possible
Is there any reason you'd like to outline as why you se the work as particularly enlightening
>>18090089
>also lol at considering natsoc LESS edgy than libertarianism
Liberterianism is litterally the epitomy of psued edgy boi ideology.
Its argues every man is first and foremost an ego in perhaps the most explicit means of ANY enlightenment era ideology and litterlaly is down to sign off on some guy concentually buying up all the watter on earth and then enslaving the population to his whim
National Socialism at in its base policy advocation is litterally just an ethnically nationalistic nordic model economy that is interested in scientific advancement
The fact that the 20th century labeled it "extremist" says alot more about the long lasting effects of war time propaganda in the age of mass telivised media then it does about the actual ideology itself
>>18090120
>national socialism has a short but very decisive track record of being fucking awful for 95% of the people involved.
...
Anon what exactly did you think the demographics of Germany looked like in 33...
Or are you just talking about the results of the war that was largely caused by the other regiems of europe??
>If you mean "socialism with nationalistic characteristics" that's less stupid but you're inviting people to not take you seriously by calling yourself natsoc
I am speaking of an ethnic ideology anon,
not denying this
>more importantly nationalism is both logically questionable and morally wrong.
Please do tell what objective charatistics by which you have attained a proof for objective morality for one of the first times in western philosophy since the late 1800s??
>We must devote ourselves to our fellow man, individually and as a whole
Why?
> and as a whole, not put up artificial walls of nationality and say "only this country matters", that's bad for everyone.
How so?
>If you are to be moral you must give aid to everyone. No holding back.
Again,
Why?
>>18090135
lol
Just because everything in the overton is a "spook" doesn't mean their isn't an inherent biological nature to man anon
Or to the world he lives in.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]