/lit/ - Literature

>>795029

Firstly, it's not "hip" to hate on Dawkins. Dawkings and his whole atheism crusade, which is quickly turning into an anti-imagination crusade, is the hip thing to be.

The "hippest" people in our society embrace atheism with open arms and praise Dawkins as a modern day Copernicus. Speaking out against this man has become the counter-culture.

That being said Atheism is exactly like Deism. It is a believe regarding our creation based on zero fucking science. We have no proof that God exists, so to believe in that entirely is irrational. However, believing undoubtedly that there isn't a god is just as, if not more irrational. Think about atheist logic.

Don't believe in deism because there is no proof. But believe in anti-deism...even though there is no proof of that.

The plain fact is that NO ONE HAS ANY FUCKING IDEA HOW OUR UNIVERSE CAME TO BE. Real scientists are agnostics because the rational choice would be to not disprove anything would proof of it's non-existence. The big bang is a fucking theory, if you disagree, tell me where the energy that created that photons that created mass came from.

Exactly.

But that's not the fucking point.