/lit/ - Literature

>>15131774
the sense of enlightenment is merely apparent.

>>14979641
all other chan's—including lc's—/lit/ boards are dead. There's a problem where the kinds of people who want to isolate from social media aren't the same demographic who want to talk about literature, but are tech and programming nerds. Most of the real 'sekrit clubs' on the internet nowadays are stuff like ssh chans, which attract precisely the above demographic. There's even some really neat stuff like live chans that are only open at certain hours. but again, the further from the mainstream the deader things become.

>>14867374
>Does Neil Postman provide any different insights to Mumford, Heidegger, McLuhan, Ellul, etc.
No. Except perhaps its historical application, but even that is dubious.

>>3645347
sounds vaguely Hegelian