/lit/ - Literature

>>7924955

dude wtf. are you the same guy who replies:
>positively absurd
to everything (even in other threads).

I remember there begin a thread on absurdism where one guy insisted on incorrectly calling everything "positively absurd". was that you? damn dude just how much do you like this phrase? I mean I get that has not reached meme status that it be instantly recognizable as a shitpost and is still subtle and nuanced enough to be a meaningless response.

Still dude, I'm worried that you might just be autistic considering this obsession with the phrase "positively absurd".

>>7911708

>where's the catastrophe
>things seem to be running perfectly.

being this deluded
------------
>Do you really think our goal should be a society where success is assured, and everyone is taken care of no matter what choices they make? What an existential nightmare.

damn. I never really thought I'd encounter a comically spoilt and sheltered rich person outside of the movies. but people like you exist.

yeah man you're right. who cares if people die of starvation. it is more important to keep away them existential nightmares.

>>7902422

>americans
>culture
>art
>media

deluded redneck spotted. the only things you are good at are chomping down burgers and consuming in general. in that sense you are important because you are a capitalist conglomerate's wet dream.

murica is what is everything wrong with the western world.

>>7895571
>>7895575

damn. are there more examples of proper ownage? when one literary person is really based and completely humiliates another?

>>7881145
>>7881147
>>7881149
>>7881160

>literally everything wrong with modern science in one theory

are you literally retarded? model-dependent realism is probably what's most right with modern science. It acknowledges that human experience is subjective and we can never be certain of "reality" since it is filtered through our perception. therefore we can only build models to explain observations/observed phenomena. it's quite simple really and you might understand that if your arts degree had not scared you so much about science.

>And why do we want to predict ? Why do we pay people to produce models after models? No scientist answers this.

jesus fucking christ. the level of autism in this thread is way too fucking high. you're asking why we seek scientific progress? to solve practical problems? so that liberal-arts-passouts can come home after a day of burger tossing and use a computer to visit an imageboard and bemoan why people spend time trying to understand the world instead of writing about feelings and stuff.

>>7873349

>because we're more advanced

top kek.

the west stands for nothing but decadence and degeneracy and there is nothing remotely culturally advanced about it in its current state it begins and ends at capitalist consumption. it's sad to observe people not be able to see this.

but oh well, I hope you enjoy your fries. both serving them and consuming them.