/lit/ - Literature

>>3486110
>I think as you've begun to realize, not everyone views these things the same.

That's why a decentralized polycentric legal system is ideal, communities of likeminded people would form who have the same ideas as to what constitutes moral and immoral. If a business in my community did something the majority thought was immoral, it wouldn't get business.

But if I was in a community that didn't consider murder to be illegal, then a company that murdered could surely thrive, but only because their customers allow that to be so.

>>3266235
>SO the community has say over what court gets monopoly? WHat makes that any different than a normal government?

The people would go to the judges they trust the most, so in order to get the most customers and outdo their competition they would uphold the law according to the wishes on the community. It's different than our normal government because right now the state has a monopoly on force and no competition.

> Are you even out of highschool yet? I have trouble believing someone as dumb as you could possibly support themselves.

I could not find the argument you provided in this post, could you please clear that up? Thanks!