/lit/ - Literature

>>20009158
The methods we use to ascertain the age of the earth are incredibly faulty and turn up highly unreliable results. It literally matters 0% whether or not Holy Scripture goes against "le ebin science" because that in and of itself is clearly a religion. You have to BELIEVE in it even when it goes against good reason because it has no actual real world merit - it's all just faith. There's nothing inherently wrong with something being inherently faith based, it's that science is just another religion which is - by default - false.
What differentiates Christianity from science is the fact that there's more evidence for Christ than there is of ancient Greece, whereas evolution cannot even explain how the "Cambrian explosion" happened so quickly. Even evolutionary theory and the various ideas about the different stages of the Earth's lifespan are based on absolutely NOTHING. Theorisation from the rings of trees and the aformentioned faulty carbon dating method. It's all speculation, unlike the life of Christ or the word of God, which time and time and TIME again has been proven right.
Faith in the One who created all the world is more legitimate than faith in a theory that you have to cope and seethe about to ignore it's obvious and debilitating faults.

>"WAIT, YOU MEAN YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN LE EBIN SCIENCE!?!?!?!?!?!? WOAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWW CHRISTIANITY MUST BE STOOOOOOOOOPID"
Yes believe it or not I'm a Christian and not a science (read: s*tan) worshiper.


TL;DR Check your mailbox, >>20009118