/lit/ - Literature

>>11054969
>Sorry I'm typing this in front of my mother...
>I apologize for my rude comment about your novel. I'm sure it's great and the prose was dandy. Please accept this apology.
Being patronizing doesn't make you seem any smarter, anon.
>This is a six-year-old tier argument.
Says the anon who unironically used common pepe's as a tool of criticism
>Why do I have to prove myself to give a simple bit of criticism? Is there any real problem with what I posted? Would it not sound better if the writer hadn't repeated 'nodded' so soon after it had already been used?
Nobody's saying you have to do anything. The fact that you decided to reply with no valuable input and use memes to voice criticism already revealed the intent of your posts in the first place, which was to upset/hurt another anon.
Now that you've been called out for being a dickhead, you can't just backtrack and pretend like you didn't try to demean someone else's work.
Try opening with intelligent criticism next time and maybe you won't just get smug faces and some slightly better than "no u" banter.