/lit/ - Literature

>Book discussion
Things wrong with this globalist fucking essay that advertises itself as a explanation of history:
>Arguments he uses:
>--"Exceptions that prove rules"
>--Provides historical knowledge as evidence something is correct because it was accepted by Romans or Greeks while never considering they could be wrong
>Times he pays tributes to agenda:
>Gender,where doesn't provide any origin of such modern absurd concept breaking his tendency(because he can't)-156-158pag
>Repeating Century of Humiliation communist propaganda-335pag
>PS;jannies here in /lit/ are tranny bitches